See the patient
The case unfolds in short clinical stages, with only the information available at that point in the story.
Clinical Cases
Short, interactive cases in liver critical care. Work through the clinical problem as it evolves, commit to an approach, and then compare your reasoning with the evidence and its limitations.
Interactive clinical cases
Each case undergoes named clinical and editorial review before publication, with the evidence and its limitations made explicit.
A patient with cirrhosis is deteriorating on the ward. Work through escalation, organ failure and what the next few days might change.
A patient with cirrhosis presents with acute variceal haemorrhage. Work through resuscitation, pre-emptive TIPS and what to do if bleeding is not controlled.
A previously well patient develops severe acute hepatitis, coagulopathy and then encephalopathy. Decide when this becomes acute liver failure and when transplant-centre involvement should begin.
A recent liver transplant recipient becomes acidotic and haemodynamically unstable. Work through early graft dysfunction, vascular catastrophe and when retransplantation needs to enter the conversation.
A patient with ACLF continues to deteriorate despite full organ support. Work through sequential prognosis, transplant options and how to approach treatment limits without turning a score into a decision.
How it works
The design deliberately holds the discussion back until you choose an approach, then puts the response distribution, evidence and uncertainty beside your decision.
The case unfolds in short clinical stages, with only the information available at that point in the story.
Choose what you would do before seeing the discussion. The aim is reasoning, not an exam score.
Each decision reveals the rationale, uncertainty, how other readers answered, and the guideline or primary literature behind it.
Editorial standard
Cases use fictionalised scenarios and no patient-identifiable information. Clinical claims are linked to guidelines or primary literature, with limitations made explicit.
They are educational resources, not protocols. Local guidance, specialist advice and individual patient factors remain decisive in clinical care.